GovWin
 
 
GovWin Recon - May 21, 2013

GovWin Recon, produced by Deltek's Federal Industry Analysis (FIA) team, is designed to support awareness and understanding of the issues impacting the government and the contractors that serve it. Recon highlights key developments surrounding government technology, policy, budget and vendor activities.

Headlines beginning with an * include quotes from Deltek analysts. 

Sequestration / Budget:

Federal IT:

Agency News:

Vendor News:

Cybersecurity:

Cloud Computing / Data Center Consolidation / Virtualization:

Health IT:

Mobility:

Waste, Fraud and Abuse:

Defense / C4ISR / Embedded Technology:

Contracting / Acquisition:

State and Local:

AEC News:

GovWin Recon is Deltek's daily newsletter highlighting federal government contracting news and analysis from around the government contracting world. Get it delivered to your e-mail inbox, free!

 

 

 

 

The business of business development in leaner times

As talking heads debate how the sequester will affect the economy, companies around the beltway are working to determine how it might damage their bottom line. Will they be directly affected? Will the “trickle down” eventually bite them? It’s very likely that many cannot afford the risk or choose not to take it, so they are looking to cushion any potential blow.
 
When budgets are tight it is easy to consider Business Development as overhead that should be eliminated; but just like the “trickle down” will eventually bite you, so will reduction of your Business Development resources. Though it may help with short term revenue projections, long-term growth and stability cannot be sacrificed for instant gratification. A thorough understanding of the market, especially when agencies are working tirelessly to rebalance their smaller budgets, is critical in order to get ahead of opportunities and align your internal resources.
 
Understanding how agencies and their budgets will be affected by the cost cutting and how they plan to absorb these cuts will not only put you ahead of the curve in terms of preparing for upcoming opportunities, but it will also inform you about what has been moved to the backburner. Resources saved are resources earned. For example, as it stands currently, the Navy’s operations and maintenance accounts will be reduced by more than $4B, its IT expenditures will be cut by 25% and at least a half dozen “new start” multi-year procurement projects will be deferred. Anticipating and knowing about these delays will prevent you from wasting business development valuable resources where they are not needed.
 
GovWin Consulting specializes in understanding each agency’s priorities and can work with your company to help uncover where that department or agency plans to shift its focus and funding.  With less budget to go around it is critical to develop an action plan in order to best position your company’s products or solutions. Communicating the values and messages that resonate with your intended audience and understanding their current financial hardships, can be the difference in winning new business. Our team delivers in-depth strategic targeting department and agency solutions tailored to your company’s business priorities and sales goals. For more information concerning GovWin Consulting’s capabilities please visit our website.

A closer look at Mississippi’s IT hardware term contracts

With more than 70 statewide term contracts from Mississippi’s IT Hardware Express Products List (EPL), it’s evident that the IT hardware category is a hot one in today’s market. The state took one solicitation and created 70-plus contracts offering a wide range of products including desktop/mobile-based computers, GIS-level workstations, monitors, printers/scanners, servers, storage, and video-conferencing equipment.

Mississippi has 77 approved manufacturers and 99 resellers on the IT Hardware EPL. While there is no confirmed spend value for statewide term contracts since they are based on purchases over the course of a contract, vendors may see large returns; statewide term contracts offer a large range of products and are available for use by all Mississippi agencies, universities, colleges and governing authorities.

The state has a purchase limit for users of $200,000 per project, per fiscal year for the IT Hardware EPL, which notes the anticipated high value. Mississippi also requires customers to obtain quotes from at least two EPL sellers if their purchase will be more than $50,000, which increases vendor competition. Another benefit to the EPL is that new sellers can submit proposals to get in on the action every six months.

Mississippi’s EPL Interactive website provides in-depth contract, vendor and pricing information, specifically for the IT Hardware EPL contract, but is not as robust with spending information. The site allows users to search by category, manufacturer, and seller name. You can also search by manufacturer reseller group, where a manufacturer sets a not-to-exceed price that resellers must obey; from there, some resellers will offer discounts on that manufacturer’s price. They keep this updated as the manufacturer changes any products on their website to make sure it meets state requirements.

 

Displayed in Table 1 are the different IT hardware categories offered under the EPL. The audio-visual components class is offered by 20 manufacturers and 66 resellers, the most of all categories. Interactive devices, which include whiteboards, voting devices and displays, is a close second with 18 manufacturers and 64 resellers. Some vendors offer both of those top contracts, like the Visix Term Contract. Deltek’s State & Local Term Contract resource has a searchable, saveable, living record for each of the more than 70 Mississippi IT hardware contracts, and 1,200 IT hardware term contracts throughout the United States.

Key take-aways

The IT Hardware EPL contract is set to expire in June 2014, and the state has indicated a replacement RFP will be released in April 2014. If IT hardware vendors don’t want to wait for the new solicitation, they can get on this contract in the next update cycle – the due date for proposals is June 4, 2013.

Forty-six states are using term contracts as an approach to purchase IT hardware. To explore more term contracts and gain insight into competitor contracts and pricing, check out Deltek’s State and Local Term Contracts resource. Not a Deltek subscriber? Click here to learn more about Deltek’s GovWin IQ database and take advantage of a free trial.

Deltek pulse: General government services April review

April saw the highest number of solicitation releases so far this year, with a total of 1,705 identified IT-related general government (GenGov) solicitations captured in Deltek’s Govwin IQ database. Last month showed a 10.7 percent increase in the total number of solicitations released by state and local governments from March.
 
From April’s solicitations, we’ve highlighted the top 11 most common IT procurement categories in the state and local market:
  • Software/Applications  – 258 solicitations
  • IT Hardware/Computers/Peripherals – 227 solicitations
  • Maintenance & Support Services – 152 solicitations
  • Implementation/Integration Services – 125 solicitations
  • Cloud/Data Center/Big Data Solution/Services – 99 solicitations
  • Wireless & Telecom Equipment/Solution/Services – 63 solicitations
  • IT Professional /Staffing/Consulting/Project Management Services – 44 solicitations
  • Content/Document/Records Management Systems – 35 solicitations
  • Education Data/Learning Management/Student Info Systems – 24 solicitations
  • ERP/Human Resources/Financial Systems – 18 solicitations
  •  Data Warehouse/Business Intelligence/Analytics – 17 solicitations
 
Here is a look at current tracked GenGov IT opportunities:
 
The state of Montana released a request for proposals (RFP) for a remediation information management system. The vision for RIMS is to improve the availability and quality of the information necessary to effectively deliver timely and accurate services to support DEQ’s remediation and associated programs, and to provide data integrity and system availability. The state is seeking a vendor to design, develop, support, and maintain the state’s new system (RIMS). Proposals are due by 2:00 MST June 11, 2013.
 
The California Department of Education released an RFP for its standardized account code structure system replacement project on April 9, 2013. The selected solution will integrate the functions of the four components into a single, Web-based system and will add functionality that streamlines the LEA reporting process for both LEAs and CDE FAIS staff. Questions and requests for meetings are due by June 5; draft proposals are due August 1; final questions are due Sept. 27, and final proposals are due November 8. An award is planned for January 2014, and the contract will run for a base term of three years.
 
The Kentucky Department of Revenue released an RFP for an electronic tobacco tax filing system on April 29, 2013. The selected solution will facilitate the licensing of cigarette and tobacco-product dealers; return filing (including supplemental data); cigarette tax stamp ordering and tracking; cross-checking between taxpayer filings and manufacturers; collection of master settlement agreement data from wholesaler filings; auditing functions and reporting. RFP responses are due by 3:00 PM EST May 17, 2013.
 
The state of New Jersey released an RFP seeking a budget preparation and monitoring system on April 30, 2013. The purpose of this RFP is to solicit proposals for the Enhanced Decision and Information System of New Jersey (EDISON) project. The new system will replace existing decision support and publishing systems used to create and monitor the statewide budget, with a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) product. Questions are due May 15. An optional pre-proposal conference will also be held May 15. Proposals are due July 31, 2013.
 
The Wyoming Department of Education has released an RFP for an educator credentialing, assignment validation, and reporting system. RFP proposals are due by May 21, 2013. The state estimates an award date of June 24, and a contract start date of July 1, 2013.
 
April’s Market Analysis
 
Analyst Derek Johnson published an article on transparency success stories of Tacoma Public Schools (TPS), where he interviewed contract manager Steve Demel. The article focuses on the school district’s transparency efforts to make all contracts available online. More school districts and state and local governments are engaging in these types of transparency initiatives. This openness assists vendors in identifying future business opportunities by seeing what and how government entities have purchased goods and services in the past.
 
GovWin IQ subscribers can read further about these projects in the provided links. Non-subscribers can gain access with a GovWin IQ free trial

Montana's 2013 spending forecast

Just four months into the year, Montana has already awarded 86 statewide contracts – 11 of which were IT related – according to the state’s transparency website. The state started off the year slowly, only awarding a few contracts in January and February, one of which was IT related; but with more than half of the contracts awarded in April, Montana’s procurement cycle is picking up steam.
 
The beginning and final months of the year are always slightly slower with contract awards, while the start and end of the fiscal year (ending in June and beginning in July for most states) prove to be much livelier for procurement. 
 
Last year, Montana’s awarded contracts had a bell-curve distribution; Q1 started off sluggish, the majority of contracts were awarded in Q2 and Q3, and activity died down again in Q4. If this year is any reflection of last year, we should look for an active next couple of months in the state.

As awarded contracts are growing in number, the Q2 spending trend becomes evident. Oftentimes states with a June-July fiscal year see a lull in spending at the end of the fiscal year, once funds have been used up. However, they typically see spending pick back up in July as project funds are approved and allocated. Therefore, vendors should be ready for high procurement activity ahead.
 
Most of this year’s awarded IT contracts are for software and software systems, and awarded vendors include Dell, High Point Networks LLC, and Hewlett Packard State and Local Enterprise Service. Further IT procurements include contracts for telecommunications systems, technological equipment, and professional services, of which CenturyLink, Compview Inc, and Northslope Capital Advisors are among the awardees. All of these vendors are pretty big players in the IT market, which means Montana contracts are fairly competitive and the state tends to do business with existing vendors. Smaller and newer vendors should take note of this.
 
The awarded contract values range from $17,000 to $500,000, and total approximately $1 million spent on IT contracts this year. Vendors should keep an eye out for more high-value contracts in the coming months as Montana still has a lot to spend. 
 
Additionally, state departments just submitted their proposed budgets and bills for approval, and as Governor Steve Bullock approves them, procurement activity will rise. The Governor’s Information Technology Summary mentions a few projects the state is most interested in pursuing, including a statewide voter registration system, enhancing e-services for property and state taxes, and a computerized management maintenance system. The state outlined more than $15 million for these opportunities, as well as more than $14 million in long-term IT projects. Further opportunities can be found in the Montana state profile database.
 
Not a Deltek subscriber? Click here to learn more about Deltek’s GovWin IQ database and take advantage of a free trial.

North Carolina’s bleak performance audit of 84 IT projects

Vendors who have ever worked on a government IT contract know that there are often discrepancies between initial estimates and actual hours worked and dollars spent on the project. In a way, overages (time and budget) have become the unspoken status quo for many projects. The problem is state and local governments looking to cut waste and seek efficiencies are realizing that this new norm is counterproductive to their bottom line.
 
The North Carolina State Auditor’s Office released a performance audit on April 12 that called out 84 IT projects that cost the state a total of $356.3 million in overages, and took a total of 389 days longer than initial project estimates suggested. Essentially, these projects have cost twice as much and taken 65 percent longer than expected.
 
The audit highlighted some of the more glaring examples, such as the state’s Medicaid management information system (MMIS), which was initially estimated to cost $92.7 million with the project completed in November 2011. However, the MMIS project ballooned to $229 million and now has a completion date of October 31, 2013. Another example is the N.C. toll collection management system (TCMS) project, which was expected to cost $19.8 million, but now has a revised budget of $41 million.
 
The most egregious project on the audit is the state’s tax information management system (TIMS), which had early estimates of costing only $525,000, with a completion date of December 31, 2011. Nonetheless, the project exploded to $97.3 million and now has a due date of January 31, 2014.
 
The audit highlighted the seriousness in which the state of North Carolina is viewing this problem and pinpointed two main issues that have heavily contributed to the overages among state IT projects:
 
1.    Actual costs and schedules differ significantly from original estimates, which can result in unplanned spending and resource use.
a.     No standard practice for creating IT projects estimates
b.    No independent validation of agency estimates
c.     No accountability for unreliable estimates
2.     Procedures do not ensure complete, accurate, and timely data.
a.     No method to identify IT projects that circumvent the SCIO approval process
b.    No assurance that historical IT project data is preserved
c.     No oversight/review of self-reported IT project data from state agencies
d.    No consequences/incentives to compel state agencies to submit IT project status reports in a timely manner
 
The auditor’s office made six recommendations to mitigate these issues:
  • North Carolina Information Technology Services (ITS) should develop and publish written guidance for developing state agency IT project cost and schedule estimates. The guidance should also describe the education, experience, and credentials needed by the personnel who develop the estimates.
  • ITS should require state agencies to obtain independent validation of the accuracy and reasonableness of IT project estimates. Alternatively, ITS should require agencies to submit appropriate and adequate documentation so that ITS can evaluate and determine the accuracy and reasonableness of agency estimates.
  • ITS should request that the General Assembly consider enacting state law to hold state agency managers accountable and require them to meet IT project cost and schedule estimates.
  • ITS should develop and document a method to identify state agency IT projects that require the SCIO’s approval. ITS should also ensure that the EPMO Tool retains both historical and current information to allow for trending and analysis.
  • ITS should develop and document procedures to verify state agency data in the EPMO Project Portfolio Management Tool.
  • ITS should consider asking the General Assembly for the authority to ensure that ITS receives project status reports on schedule.
 
North Carolina’s new chief information officer (CIO), Chris Estes, agreed with all six recommendations produced from the audit and said ITS will address the issues found in the audit in the upcoming Statewide IT Plan, which is expected to be released on October 1, 2013.
 
Analyst’s Take
 
The audit reviewed IT projects from December 2011 to October 2012, and selected only projects whose original cost and schedule estimate data was available. North Carolina has a total of 1,034 state IT projects contained in its Project Portfolio Management database, with 128 active IT projects valued at $1.7 billion. Besides the cost of the overages identified, the fact that only 84 out of 1,034 IT projects had enough information to be included in the audit to begin with more than justifies the audit’s findings and recommendations.
 
If taken seriously, the North Carolina 2014 IT plan will include hard and fast solutions to improve oversight and management of state IT projects moving forward. These solutions will likely come in the form of policy, procedure and personnel restructures that will affect existing contracts and future procurements. Vendors looking to do business with North Carolina should count on an extra layer of scrutiny during the procurement process, especially when it deals with pricing, scheduling, and the management and success rate of past IT projects.
 
  
Not a Deltek subscriber? Click here to learn more about Deltek’s GovWin IQ database and take advantage of a free trial.

 

 

Florida's FY 2014 Budget

What a difference a fiscal year makes! For the past two budget cycles (FY 2012 and FY 2013), Florida Governor Rick Scott has been requesting deep cuts to health care, education and public safety to curtail the state’s declining tax revenues and multibillion-dollar deficit. Now, Governor Scott is touting a $4 billion surplus, and the fiscal year 2014 budget recommendations Scott released on February 6 actually add funds to state programs for the first time in six years. Also, in a reversal from years passed, Scott’s top budget priorities for FY 2014 include health care and education, both of which were once on the chopping block. 
 
The governor’s FY 2014 state budget recommendation, also called the Florida Families First budget, asks for a pay raise for K-12 teachers and state workers, an increase in funding for state universities, and, surprisingly, accepts federal funds to support the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA). If adopted, the Republican governor’s FY 2014 budget would be the largest in state history, at $74 billion.
 
 

 
This economic upswing has allowed Scott to tailor his budget around job creation by cutting business taxes, investing in workforce training programs, and calling for $8.3 billion in transportation projects. Scott has also added $3 billion to higher education, essentially restoring funds to pre-recession levels. Additionally, Florida’s unemployment rate dropped to 7.7 percent, signifying an increase in revenue from income taxes. The combination of less spending and larger revenues has resulted in this unexpected surplus.
 
Now that the state is seeing a fruitful recovery, there is more push from department heads to restore services and programs and take on new projects. Despite cries for relief, Scott’s budget largely resists large-scale funding restorations; instead, he has smartly decided to split the difference by recommending a smaller increase in spending while opting to replenish the state’s once-dry emergency fund.
 
 

 
The top vertical increases in Scott’s FY 2014 budget recommendations (compared to FY 2013) focus on higher education (66.2 percent), transportation (33.7 percent), and public finance (24.3 percent) verticals. The Highway Safety and Motor Vehicle Department within the transportation vertical received a $20.6 million increase compared to FY 2013. This increase includes a $4.9 million funding request to procure a new motorist service system that is expected to be implemented over multiple years.
 
The top vertical decreases in the FY 2014 budget recommendations are for natural resources (-5.8 percent), K-12 education (-7.3 percent) and social services (-9.6 percent) verticals. The bulk of losses for social services are represented by a $575 million decrease from the Elder Affairs and Children and Family Services departments, stemming from reduced public services and pending layoffs. However, the IT expenditures under the social services vertical actually see a 7.9 percent increase from FY 2013, due in large part to projects such as the state’s public assistance eligibility system and the child dependency information management system.
 

 
One of the bigger gaffes Florida faced during the 2013 fiscal year was the defunding and decommissioning of the Agency of Enterprise Information Technology (AEIT). Last year, Scott vetoed legislation that would have replaced AEIT with a new central information technology agency that would have focused more on the state’s data center consolidation effort. Scott justified the veto by stating he believed the new agency’s scope was too narrow. Even though both Scott and the legislature promised to work together for fiscal year 2014 to avoid another misstep, it seems the House and Senate have each introduced competing legislation – though each is requesting a new agency, the agencies would have differing scopes and oversight schemes. An aide in Senator Jeremy Ring’s office confirmed that, despite political maneuvering, the hope is to create a central agency to manage the state’s IT efforts and oversee nearly $51 billion in IT contracts, rather than have 19 different state agencies inefficiently managing their own. 
 
There are two major differences in oversight and scope between the House and Senate bills. Senate Bill 1762 calls for the head of the new agency to report to the governor alone, while House Bill 5009 calls for the head of the new agency to report to the governor as well as the cabinet. There’s also a difference in scope, as the House bill would pare down the new agency’s ability to influence IT purchasing decisions, while the Senate bill would create a department with robust authority including oversight of all IT purchases that involved multiple state agencies. Ultimately, HB 5009 would really only allow the new agency to track and analyze IT purchases and draft IT strategic plans in more of an advisory role. Since Governor Scott has yet to throw his support behind either bill, this battle will likely continue into the summer.
 
For an extended version of this article, please go here. 
 
For more information on Florida FY 2014 budget, visit the state profile here.
 
Not a Deltek subscriber? Click here to learn more about Deltek’s GovWin IQ database and take advantage of a free trial.

 

Hawaii's FY 2013-2015 Biennium Budget

In his FY 2013-2015 Executive Biennium Budget, Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie highlighted the daunting challenges that faced his administration during the last biennium, including a $1.3 billion potential budget shortfall that threatened deep programmatic cuts to department operations statewide. The governor utilized a fiscal strategy to only address pressing needs while investing in the state’s future, with goals to improve government efficiency and transparency. For this biennium, Hawaii’s gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to increase by 2.4 percent in 2013, while unemployment rates continue to decrease.

The new biennium budget (seen above in Figure 1) has several areas of investment, including:

  • Early learning and early childhood health
  • Education IT and digital curriculums
  • Increased resources for Hawaii’s aging population
  • Environmental sustainability and protection

The biggest gains by department from FY 2013-2014 include the Department of Human Services ($309 million), Department of Budget and Finance ($251 million), and Department of Transportation ($52 million). The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands saw a budget decrease of $140 million. Investments for FY 2014-2015 include $151 million for the Department of Human Services and $91 million for the Department of Budget and Finance.

Although the numbers in Figure 2 look as if Hawaii has invested millions in information technology, the numbers actually represent more transparency into Hawaii’s IT reporting. Deltek was able to gather more data on the total value of IT projects in the state for the biennium budget. Health IT was a major investment, including $2 million for its health information exchange (HIE), $45 million for Medicaid IT initiatives, and $15 million for an electronic medical record (EMR) system. The Department of Taxation is also investing nearly $32 million into its tax system modernization project for FY 2013-2015.

Despite tough times that followed the economic recession, Hawaii has laid the groundwork for a stable foundation and is continuing to increase both its GDP and IT spending. Vendors working in the education, health, and environmental space should check out Deltek’s analysis on Hawaii’s budget here, and brush up on the Aloha State in our state profile application. For a free trial, please click here.

Deltek Pulse: Health care and social services in review – April 2013

April saw the release of a tenth round of Health Insurance Exchange (HIX) Establishment Grants, awarded to Arkansas ($16.5 million), Hawaii ($128.1 million), Illinois ($115.8 million), New Hampshire ($5.4 million), and Rhode Island ($9.8 million). Details about states’ plans for these funds are explained here. On a related note, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) also announced the availability of new funding to support navigators in states with federally-facilitated or state-partnership HIX models. Activity also picked up in states that received funding for model design through CMS’ state innovation model (SIM) initiative, including Texas and Iowa.

Notable solicitation releases in April included:

  • The District of Columbia Department of Health Care Finance (DHCF) released an RFP for a Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) State Self-Assessment (SS-A). Deltek will provide updates about the future procurement of a Medicaid management information system (MMIS) here.
  • The Rhode Island Department of Administration, on behalf of the Department of Human Services (DHS), released an RFP for maintenance and operations of the InRHODES eligibility system.
  • Three states released RFPs for pharmacy benefits management (PBM) services, including the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS), Mississippi Department of Health (DOH), and the Indiana Department of Administration (DOA).
  • New Hampshire’s Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) released an RFP for SIM planning services.

Notable contract awards in April included:

Big news surfaced in Louisiana with the cancelation of a $29 million contract with Deloitte for the replacement Medicaid Eligibility Determination System (MEDS), originally awarded in April 2011. The state’s Office of Contractual Review cited the original RFP included a preference for a .net solution while Deloitte's contract proposal uses Microsoft Dynamics. The Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH) asked for an additional requirement for the system that was outside the original scopeand warranted a new RFP release. Prior to becoming the secretary of DHH, Bruce Greenstein was managing director of Worldwide Health for Microsoft. Greenstein also hired another Microsoft employee, Zachery Jiwa, to be DHH's chief technology officer, but he left the department in November 2012. DHH now plans to release a new RFP for the replacement MEDS.

Looking to May and the upcoming summer months, we anticipate activity will pick up in states participating in the SIM initiative as CMS approves states’ proposals, of which many have now undergone changes after initial review from CMS. We also anticipate an influx of contract awards for HIX navigator programs, particularly with CMS’ announcement of the availability of federal funding for navigators. States in federally-facilitated or partnership HIX models may also begin to draft legislation and plan for takeovers of additional HIX functions in the future, such as the recently enacted House Bill 1508 in Arkansas.

Not a Deltek subscriber? Click here to learn more about Deltek's GovWin IQ service and gain access to a free trial. 

PSAP demographics across the United States

Last April, Deltek utilized the Federal Communications Commission’s PSAP Registry to give vendors an overview of public safety answering points (PSAPs) in counties nationwide. Now, we’re using the current registry to detail information on consolidation efforts and other changes that have taken place across the country in the last year.

 

Consolidation projects have been taking place for the last few years as cities and counties work to become more efficient and, ultimately, save more money; however, the total number of PSAPs actually increased by 64 from 2012 to 2013. Still, of the 8,393 PSAPs, only 7,485 act as the primary call-taking location – 908 are considered “orphaned” and are no longer utilized. These orphaned PSAPs will not be included in future filings with the FCC.

 

PSAP Quick Facts 2013

U.S. Population (July 2012 estimate)

313,914,000

Total number of PSAPs

8,393

Average number of individuals served by each PSAP

37,401

State with the most PSAPs

Texas

State with the fewest PSAPs

New Hampshire

Average number of calls to 911/ year (NENA)

240,000,000

Average number of calls to 911/day

657,534

Just as in 2012, Texas has the most PSAPs (667), followed by California (587) and Illinois (422) – all three states also saw slight increases in their total number of PSAPs year to year.

 

New Hampshire still has the fewest PSAPs (5), and Delaware’s nine puts it second from the bottom. Washington, D.C. held that spot in 2012, but an increase from seven to 11 PSAPs now ties the district with Vermont and Hawaii for having the third lowest number.

 

As of April 2013, a total of 719 PSAPs have changed name, state, county or city compared to only 679 that had as of April 2012. The majority of these took place in California, followed distantly by Nebraska – providing further evidence that dispatch centers in many locations are consolidating efforts and working to cover a wider geographical span.

 

The below chart provides a visual representation of PSAP locations by city and county in 2012 and 2013, as well as information on where vendors can find the most opportunities.

 

Analyst’s Take

 

The number of dispatch opportunities in each of the regional areas has remained steady since 2012, with nine solicitations in the works in Los Angeles and Boston, and 12 within 100 miles of Chicago and 21 within 100 miles of New York City. This should provide some hope for vendors that cities and counties are still interested in purchasing dispatching technologies despite the tough economic climate.

 

Dispatch technologies are among the most vital tools that police use, and localities have little choice than to purchase new ones once they reach the end of their life cycles. This trend, along with increasing number of PSAPs, is likely to continue as individuals’ ability to report where and when crimes take place becomes easier. 

Not a Deltek subscriber? Click here to learn more about Deltek’s GovWin IQ database and take advantage of a free trial.

 

More Entries